You're acquiring a company. Or being acquired. Or merging. The tech diligence is starting and people are asking: "Is their stack sound?" "Do their contracts create post-close liabilities?" "Can our architecture support their scale?" "What's the integration plan?"
You need answers that don't come from the vendors themselves.
Deal activity is underway. Technology diligence is ramping on a tight timeline. The vendor-driven market sees M&A and repositions immediately. The target's vendor relationships become a negotiation point. Vendors start offering "integration packages." Procurement teams evaluate the target's vendor stack through the lens of cost, not technical fit.
Meanwhile, you're answering questions with incomplete information. Vendors are positioning themselves as critical to integration success.
Contracts that looked fine in a standalone company suddenly create post-close liabilities.
Technology due diligence isn't about diligence. It's about negotiation. The buyer uses tech questions to justify a lower purchase price. The vendor uses tech uncertainty to position themselves as indispensable. The actual technology gets lost.
Get independent answers on the technical and contractual questions before they become negotiation theater.
With ITBroker.com, you have independent representation. We work with 967 providers. Our commission is the same regardless of which vendor you choose. That means no incentive to keep expensive vendors in place or to push unnecessary integration costs.
When you're evaluating a deal, you need a partner who's equally committed to uncovering technical risks and protecting you from vendor-driven integration complexity. That's what independent representation means.
Technology is 30% of deal risk and 70% of integration cost.
No pitch. No prep. Just answers about your deal timeline and what you need to validate.
